unique number for each participant
unique number for each group
unique number for each session
number of participant within the group
experimental condition: 0 = normative agreement before membership change, 1 = no
individual return from the public good
low-return (0) or high-return (1) from the public good
How much each allocated punishment point reduces the income of the punished pers
the maximum number of punishment points that the person can allocate to another
how much the person can contribute to the public good per round
the number of persons per group
the number of persons per session
the number of groups per session
the round after which members switch groups
total number of periods (last one does not involve contribution/punishment decis
the period/round of the public goods game
the participant's contribution to the public good
the number of punishment points allocated this round to the first group-member
the number of punishment points allocated this round to the second group-member
the total number of punishment points that the participant allocated this round
the total number of punishment points that the participant received this round
what the participant thinks is the appropriate contribution for hypothetical gro
what the participant thinks is the appropriate contribution for the hypothetical
what the participant thinks his/her group members think is the appropriate contr
what the participant thinks his/her new group member(s) think(s) is the appropri
normative score used for sorting: Contribute1 - ((Contribute2 + Contribute3) / 2
ranking of participant on basis of normative score compared to other participant
a hypothetical situation is presented: member 1 (return 0.75) contributes 0, mem
a hypothetical situation is presented: member 1 (return 0.75) contributes 20, me
participant's guess of what his/her group members answered on variable PunishN1_
participant's guess of what his/her group members answered on variable PunishN2_
participant's agreement on a scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agr
participant's view on how much a member with return 0.75 should contribute if th
participant's view on how much a member with return 0.50 should contribute if th
participant's rating of how appropriate a contribution of 0 is on a scale from -
participant's rating of how appropriate a contribution of 3 is on a scale from -
participant's rating of how appropriate a contribution of 7 is on a scale from -
participant's rating of how appropriate a contribution of 10 is on a scale from
participant's rating of how appropriate a contribution of 13 is on a scale from
participant's rating of how appropriate a contribution of 17 is on a scale from
participant's rating of how appropriate a contribution of 20 is on a scale from
social value orientation angle
social value orientation type: 1 = Altruist, 2 = Prosocial, 3 = Individualist, 4
age in years
gender, options are: Male, Female, Other
nationality, open-ended
whether the participant is currently a student
the study background of the participant
self-reported rating on the understanding of the experimental instructions: Good
how many experiments has the participant completed in this lab
how many of the other participants in the room does the participant know by firs
did the participant follow a course on game theory in the past
political orientation on left(1) - right(10) dimension
What do you think is the purpose of this experiment?
Can you think of any real life situations in which you have to make similar cont
If you have any other comments on the experiment, you can give them in the text
Suppose that all 3 participants contribute their complete budget of 20 points to
Suppose that all 3 participants contribute nothing from their budget of 20 point
Suppose your return from the group account is 0.50. You and your group members t
How much is your income reduced if your two group members together assigned you
participant's first answer to q1
participant's first answer to q2
participant's first answer to q3
participant's first answer to q4
participant's first answer to q5
participant's first answer to q6